Measuring success in human risk management is notoriously tricky. Unlike other areas of cybersecurity, where success is defined by stopping breaches or identifying vulnerabilities, metrics for Human Risk Programs often feels intangible. The absence of “bad things happening” doesn’t always translate into clear, quantifiable success. Here’s why many programs struggle to show measurable impact—and what can be done about it.
Why Measuring Human Risk Success Is So Hard—and How to Do It Right
Recent Posts
- CVE-2025-21630 – Linux Kernel: io_uring: Uninitialized Message Queue Inquire
- CVE-2025-21629 – “Linux Net IF – IPv6 extension header offload vulnerability”
- CVE-2024-5198 – OpenVPN for Windows DLL Injection Null Pointer Dereference
- CVE-2024-57903 – Linux kernel SO_REUSEPORT Inet Socket Restriction Comic Book Bug
- CVE-2024-57902 – Linux Kernel af_packet: VLAN Get TCI Vulnerability